Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners

To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners
From: "Rob Geraghty" <harper@wordweb.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 09:18:26 +1000
In-reply-to: <004501c0d179$0039a640$b55dfea9@ameritech.net>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk

Maris wrote:
> Slide film is generally less grainy than print film
> in scanning sky.  Have you found any good print film for sky?

Someone mentioned Supra 400.  I wish someone would produce
a 100 ASA print film optimised for scanning!

Rob



Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
http://wordweb.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners
  - From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@attglobal.net>
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners
  - From: "shAf" <michael@shaffer.net>

References:
- Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners
  - From: "Maris V. Lidaka, Sr." <mlidaka@ameritech.net>

Prev by Date: RE: filmscanners: LS4000 and sharpness
Next by Date: Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners
Next by thread: Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread