ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: OT: Film lengths was: Cleaning slides (PEC tips)





Laurie Solomon wrote:

> That is the safest conclusion.
> 

> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Maris V. Lidaka,
> Sr.

> 
> So the conclusion is - don't try to squeeze out an extra frame or two?
> 
> Maris
> 

When mentally reviewing my own many thousands of rolls of film, I think 
I can honestly say that the labs I've used have done equal or probably 
more damage to frames within the "legal" frame areas (numbers 1-36), 
than to the "over 36" frames.  So, for me, the $aving$ of an extra 2-3 
frames per roll, and the number of times that last extra frame has 
either saved my butt, or been an unexpected keeper that I would have 
missed, says it has little to do with "safest conclusions".

Art




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.