Larry wrote:
>The only way you might experience the differences you are referring to is
if you are scanning to a jpeg output which creates an imprecise workflow and
inconsistent results.
That's exactly what I did (it's the way HP Precision Scan works), and it
explains what I'm seeing. I bow to the master. :-)
Those who haven't seen Larry's compression comparison page at
http://imagecompress.com/comparison.htm
it's an interesting (and useful) read.
Best regards--LRA
-----------------------------------------------
FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com
Reserve your name now at http://www.email.com