ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon performance



Dave wrote:
>Nikon scanners.  Specifically, I'd like to find out whether scans
>performed *without* ICE on the new scanners have the same problems
>with excessive dust and scratches as on the old scanners, or if this
>has been improved, and if so, by how much.

What problems did the old scanners have with excessive dust and scratches?
 I haven't seen anything with my LS30 I'd describe as a problem with respect
to dust and scratches on chromogenic film.  The only problem I've had with
the the Nikon I'd describe as a fault is the jaggies produced by Nikonscan
(which Vuescan cures).  Do you mean the collimated light highlighting dust
and scratches?  I wouldn't expect that to change either.

> In addition, I'd like to know if performance *with* ICE has
> improved when scanning Kodachrome and B&W films.

Presumably the behaviour would be identical with Kodachrome
and B&W film because the behaviour with IR is the same.

Rob


Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
http://wordweb.com






 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.