ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance



In a message dated 6/8/2001 12:32:29 PM EST, HEMINGD@POLAROID.COM writes:

> I have been biting my tongue throughout this whole dust conversation but I
>  guess I am finally baited out. I have done actual scans on the scanner with
>  a LED light source and the SS4000. It was quite obvious to me that there 
was
>  considerably more dust shown on the scanner with the LED light source. I
>  also noticed the scans were more contrasty. I will leave it to others to
>  decide whether this is good or bad but in my view it is actual.

I did a scan of the same slide on my LS-30 and the SS4000 that you
loaned me (thanks again by the way), and didn't see any difference.
The same dust spots looked the same to me on both.  I'll be the first
to admit that I didn't look at this too closely though, and this was quite
a while ago.

Regards,
Ed Hamrick




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.