ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Was New Nikon performance, now dust



From: <EdHamrick@aol.com>


> In a message dated 6/10/2001 8:32:54 AM EST,
kingphoto@mindspring.com writes:
>
> > I've never done critical comparisons of resolution between
> >  them, as they both resolve grain pretty well, and seem about the
same
> >  in terms of resolution.
>
> It would be useful if you'd do a 2500 dpi and 2700 dpi scan of the
> same bits of film, to demonstrate the effect you're talking about.
>
> Regards,
> Ed Hamrick

I've just finished making comparison scans.  Can someone give me
pointers how small to make the files?  Or I could put larger files on
a web site if anyone offers.

Dave




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.