ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance



On Fri, 08 Jun 2001 16:07:41 -0700  Arthur Entlich (artistic@ampsc.com) 
wrote:

> I suppose its possible Polaroid owners are unwilling to admit they 
> spend their nights at home doing dust spotting, since they laid out all 
> that ca$h on the SS4000, but I'd expect someone would break ranks and 
> blow the whistle.

I can confirm that I do just this. Dust etc are a problem with every 
filmscanner I have used; I just accept it as a necessary part of dealing 
with some originals. 

I agree with Ed that higher res and better optical sharpness increase the 
problem most of all, but I also think collimated light does emphasise 
muck.

Regards 

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner 
info & comparisons




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.