ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2



No. My mother died so I was away.
I hope to do a test next week if I have the time.
Sweden's biggest newspaper and their photo department did a speed test on 
the scanner with   Silverfast software.

Time including auto focus + calibrating  6x7cm original
20MB, 1min 20 sec
82MB, 1min 25 sec (!)
260MB, 3 min 15 sec (full optical resolution  6 x 7 cm  original)
Impressive if you compare to Imacon or all other scanners.
Mikael Risedal
Photographer
Lund Sweden
--





>From: Marvin Demuth <mdemuth@polobeam.net>
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.1-Silverfast 5.2
>Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 07:31:36 -0500
>
>At 03:18 PM 6/7/01, Mikael Risedal wrote:
>
>>I heard  from collegues at a Swedish newspaper that the new Polaroid 120
>>scanner in many respects is better than a tested Imacon scanner.
>>I will test the polaroid scanner this sunday and see if this true.
>
>Mikael, did you have the opportunity to make the test?
>
>Marvin Demuth
>
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.