ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Films for scanning was filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Was New Nikon performance, now dust



In <001101c0f411$012076a0$3800000a@phoenix>, Rob Geraghty wrote:

> FWIW I scanned a frame off a recent roll of T400CN and in the midtones there
> is no significant grain visible at 2700dpi.  There's something like grain in
> the shadows but as it's a C41 B&W neg film I'm not sure how to label it.
> The grain appears to vary with the exposure to light, so the dark areas are
> more grainy than the light areas.  I exposed the roll at EI250 rather than
> the rated 400.  Colour C41 film grain doesn't seem to vary as much with
> exposure to light.  I'll have to check some more.
>
These C41 B&W films (T400CN and Ilford XP2) are noted for producing finer 
grain if you deliberately overexpose them. I usually rate mine at 280ASA for 
this reason.

Brian Rumary, England

http://freespace.virgin.net/brian.rumary/homepage.htm





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.