ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Time to upgrade: Opinions wanted



In a message dated 6/18/2001 6:59:21 AM EST, danh@selectsa.com writes:

> Are you suggesting that the LS-40 represents better value (less resolution
>  and D-Max, but also less expensive), or that the differences in
>  resolution/D-Max are so small as to be insignificant, or that this scanner
>  has less bugs than others and so is worth the trade-offs in res/D-Max?  Or
>  all of the above?

It's a good value, and the difference in resolution/D-Max isn't significant
for what I scan.  If you want to scan things larger than 35mm, use a slide
feeder or scan mainly slide film or ISO 50 film (none of which I do myself),
then you might make different tradeoffs.

Regards,
Ed Hamrick




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.