ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Magnification of light - AND brief density math lesson...



> [rafe b:]
> >> And BTW, when Austin talks about 5080 dpi from 35 mm film,
> >> he probably should have mentioned that it takes about an hour
> >> or so to produce that scan, in RGB.  I hope you're not in
> >> a hurry. <g>
>
> [Austin:]
> >That's not entirely true.  It depends on the exposure time, and
> how new the
> >bulb is.  If you set exposure to min, it will scan in around %20
> the time.
> >
> >B&W is single pass, and can use min exposure, so it is really
> comparable to
> >the newer scanners in terms of scan time.
>
>
> I'm afraid I don't understand.  Doesn't the proper exposure
> depend on the image under consideration?

No.  More so the film.  The image data only spans a small part of the 16 bit
range.  Increasing exposure time only incureases DMax.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.