ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Scanner resolution (was: BWP seeks scanner)



On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:33:35 -0700  Moreno Polloni (mp@dccnet.com) wrote:

> I don't think anyone is trying to make super critical judgements here. 
> To me
> the scans need to be better matched before attempting to draw any
> conclusions about scanner quality.

Even that is little help, since the operator may have subtracted 
information unequally and/or incorrectly from one or both.

What we really want to know is the potential for quality, the available 
envelope, and finding this out is a veritable gumshoe job.

Regards 

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner 
info & comparisons




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.