Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: Matrox G400 vs G450
Not much difference in performance. The G450 was cheaper to produce and the
chip ran a bit colder. The G400 I think was a two chip card. The G450 a 1
chip card. The G550 has just been announced.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Kehl" <bobkehl@kvernkehl.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 10:02 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Matrox G400 vs G450
> I've been thinking about buying a Matrox G450 with the dual head feature
due
> to recommendations on this list. I just bought a workstation that will
come
> with a Matrox G400. For scanning and tweaking in PS6 is this card going
to
> do as well as the G450 or should I upgrade. What is the difference
between
> these two cards? Looking at the Matrox web site, it does not seem
apparent
> to me. Any help?
>
> Bob Kehl
>
|
