Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: "Thanks" - (was Digital vs Conventional Chemical Darkroom)

To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: filmscanners: "Thanks" - (was Digital vs Conventional Chemical Darkroom)
From: "John C. Jernigan" <heritage-arts@att.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:38:32 -0500
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
References: <LPBBJFDFNKDNPCANOLOBEEDKCAAA.laurie@advancenet.net>

Thanks to all who offered their thoughts re permanance of digital vs
chemical prints. I suppose we'll know for sure in about 200 years.   :>)

John J.

References:
- RE: filmscanners: Digital vs Conventional Chemical Darkroom
  - From: "laurie" <laurie@advancenet.net>

Prev by Date: Re: filmscanners: LED Illumination for Film Scanners
Next by Date: Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings
Previous by thread: RE: filmscanners: Digital vs Conventional Chemical Darkroom
Next by thread: Re: filmscanners: Digital vs Conventional Chemical Darkroom
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread