RE: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings

[derek_c@cix.co.uk (Derek Clarke)]

Look at the end...

One liners can make serious points, and his was that double-shooting can 
make you miss the action.

laurie@advancenet.net (laurie) wrote:

> For the life of me, I fail to understand why Walter Bushell would post a
> message to the list repeating what Karl and Tony said on the list 
> already
> without making any further contribution.  Did Mr Bushell forget to put 
> in
> his own comments and response?  That would be the only explanation I can
> think of; or am I missing something.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Walter Bushell
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 9:11 AM
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Tony Sleep wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 01:15:00 -0700  Karl Schulmeisters
> > (karlsch@earthlink.net) wrote:
> >
> > > Respectfully, many pros are switching to digital.
> >
> > For newspaper use it's standard now. But I was recently speaking to 
> > an AP
> > photographer who was grumbling that he has to try and shoot everything
> > twice now - on dig for the wire, and film for the magazine market 
> > which AP
> > are now trying to muscle in on.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Tony Sleep
> > http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner
> > info & comparisons
> >
> 
> ____> Heraclites already proved you cannot photograph the same river
> twice.
> 
>