Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings

To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings
From: TonySleep@halftone.co.uk (Tony Sleep)
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:47 +0100 (BST)
In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0106251005090.15430-100000@panix6.panix.com>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk

On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:11:11 -0400 (EDT)  Walter Bushell (proto@panix.com) 
wrote:

> > Heraclites already proved you cannot photograph the same river
> twice.

Well, this AP guy was definitely having problems with football games :)

Regards 

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner 
info & comparisons

References:
- Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings
  - From: Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com>

Prev by Date: RE: filmscanners: ScanWit Yellow stain
Next by Date: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Polaroid 4000 vs. Nikon L4000
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings
Next by thread: Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread