Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: filmscanners: Polaroid 4000 vs. Nikon L4000
Sam,
Rather get involved with the "specmanship" issues. I suggest you try each.
Polaroid offers a 30 day "good as gold" guarantee so if your are
dissatisfied for ANY reason you can return it to your dealer for a full
refund, excluding any shipping costs.
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam A. McCandless [mailto:samcc@vom.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 10:13 AM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Cc: Barbara White
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Polaroid 4000 vs. Nikon L4000
>I'm trying to decide between these two scanners. They both claim 16-bit
>output, however the Polaroid scans in 12 bit and outputs in 16; and the
>Nikon scans in 14 bit (I think) and outputs in 16. Are both of these
>options as good as true 16 bit scanning?
>
>Any input would be so appreciated, since I'm really a newbie on this
>subject, but I do want to scan in 16 bit.
>
>Barbara -
My impression is that neither is as good as true 16-bit scanning
would be, that each scanner's software necessarily puts its lower
high-bit scan in a two-byte/16-bit wrapper for the computer,
hopefully without doing any harm by supplying the missing bits. I
don't see how that could be as good as actually having used all 16
bits in the measurement of the colors. But I don't know of a true
16-bit option, and I'm just getting started with the SS4000.
Sam
|