Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

ПРОЕКТЫ

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: LS-4000ED Dmax 4,2 or rather 2,3?

To: "'filmscanners@halftone.co.uk'" <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Subject: RE: filmscanners: LS-4000ED Dmax 4,2 or rather 2,3?
From: "Wilson, Paul" <PWilson@gomez.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:22:51 -0400
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk

Title: RE: filmscanners: LS-4000ED Dmax 4,2 or rather 2,3?

So, has anyone done any comparisons between the Polaroid SS120 and the Nikon LS8000 as far as shadow detail goes? What about an LS4000 vs. a SS4000?

TIA

Paul Wilson

Prev by Date: Re: filmscanners: Printing: Settings, calibration & whatever
Next by Date: Re: filmscanners: Printing: Settings, calibration & whatever
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: LS-4000ED Dmax 4,2 or rather 2,3?
Next by thread: RE: filmscanners: LS-4000ED Dmax 4,2 or rather 2,3?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.