Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Does CMM work on Win2000?

["Steve Greenbank" <steve@gccl.fsbusiness.co.uk>]

Surely you should archive with the correct profile where it is known. You
can always ignore it later, but if you don't know what it is to start with
you can never get the exact archive image back.

Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Maris V. Lidaka, Sr." <mlidaka@ameritech.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 10:59 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Does CMM work on Win2000?


> Yes, for the web.  But what about for print?  My understanding is that
> colors outside of the sRGB gamut are printable, primarily cyans.
>
> My method, then, is to use Adobe or Bruce RGB for working with the image,
> then archive without any embedded color space, but convert to sRGB for
> posting on the web.
>
> Maris
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rob Geraghty" <harper@wordweb.com>
> To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 8:27 AM
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Does CMM work on Win2000?
>
> [snipped]
>
> | In the absence of expensive hardware and software to accurately profile
my
> | whole setup, I'm beginning to think that sticking to sRGB is probably
the
> | simplest way out.
> |
> | Rob
> |
> |
> |
> |
>
>