Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Minolta DiMAGE Scan & Dimage 7 camera

To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Minolta DiMAGE Scan & Dimage 7 camera
From: Arthur Entlich <artistic@ampsc.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 02:21:57 -0700
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
References: <1evrjix.k51910vb72n1M%proto@panix.com>

Walter Bushell wrote:

> It is precisely the randomized nature of film that alaising does not
> occur. There is no grid, so there is nothing to beat against, so to
> speak.

So maybe the answer is to randomize the sensor array, Captain?  Of
course, while keeping the dilithium crystals aligned... ;-)

Art

References:
- Re: filmscanners: Minolta DiMAGE Scan & Dimage 7 camera
  - From: proto@panix.com (Walter Bushell)

Prev by Date: Re: filmscanners: On dust
Next by Date: Re: filmscanners: exposing C41 for scanning ( was gibberish
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: Minolta DiMAGE Scan & Dimage 7 camera
Next by thread: RE: filmscanners: Minolta DiMAGE Scan & Dimage 7 camera
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread