ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Grain aliasing myth (was Minolta DiMAGE Scan & etc)



On Sun, 1 Jul 2001 22:29:44 -0400  Dave King (kingphoto@mindspring.com) 
wrote:

> You see grain size vary by tone/color in analogue prints too.

Yes

> It
> would be very interesting to compare CCD scans and inkjet prints to
> analogue enlargements.  I'm wondering if the grain variance effect is
> similar.

Exactly this, and the appearance of sometimes massively worse grain in 
dig. versions, was the original requirement for the grain aliasing 
hypothesis.

Regards 

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner 
info & comparisons




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.