I as well try to use Matrox whenever I build a system. It helps that I don't
play computer games, as they are sub par for that. One aspect of Matrox'
approach toward drivers is the fact that they continue to get their drivers
certified by Microsoft's certification lab, which means a particular driver
is less likely to be a cause of stability problems. But they don't force to
certified drivers on folks, and also offer the new drivers that have been
submitted but not completed certification. Also, their cards have excellent
display quality.
Pat
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Sleep" <TonySleep@halftone.co.uk>
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 18:19:28 -0700 Pat Perez (patdperez@yahoo.com) wrote:
>
> > the
> > most infamous being 3rd party manufacturer video drivers
>
> Yup! Absolutely (one reason why I conservatively stick to Matrox is that -
> eventually anyhow - their drivers usually get to be well behaved).
>
> It may be useful if people suffering Nikonscan crashes could identify
> their graphics cards and drivers.
>
> Regards
>
> Tony Sleep
> - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner
> info & comparisons
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at
