ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unsharp mask was Re: filmscanners: Getting started question



At 08:28 AM 7/15/01 +1000, Rob wrote:

>Gad, unsharp mask over 100%?  I've been using a radius of 2.0 and only 60%.
>Is there something I'm seriously missing about USM?


Using the USM tool is a black art.  Dan Margulis has written 
some great articles about using this tool most effectively. 
I believe the the text from these articles also appears in 
the newer versions of "Professional Photoshop."

You might try backing off on the radius and cranking up the 
amount.  Eg., radius 1.0, amt=100%, for a 2700 dpi image. 
Lower resolutions require lower numbers.  Higer resolutions 
allow higher numbers.


rafe b.





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.