ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Which Buggy Software?



At 07:29 PM 7/15/01 +0100, Tony Sleep wrote:
>On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 07:14:41 -0400  rafeb (rafeb@channel1.com) wrote:
>
>> And as it turns out, I am a big Dan Margulis 
>> fan... hence my rotten attitude about ICC 
>> color management, etc.  I think, once you 
>> start working in the "Margulis" mode, you're 
>> probably spoiled forever from using these fancy 
>> profiling and monitor-calibration tools.
>
>Just as a matter of interest, how does he accomodate interchange of RGB 
>files with other systems, eg reprographic houses? Lend them your monitor? 
>;)


Nope.  Dan's approach is to go by the numbers 
(RGB values, or L*a*b values, or CMYK values) 
rather than the appearance of the image on the 
screen.  So in a way, Dan's approach is quite 
absolute and mathematical, if followed rigorously.

I've sent PS 4 files for printing on Lightjet 
and have never been disappointed by the output. 
No profiles involved, nor did the lab inquire about 
profiles, or make recommendations.  AFAIK, the 
lab did not modify the images I sent.

Call me lucky, maybe.


rafe b.






 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.