ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Link to Nikon 8000 banding example...



On Wed, 18 Jul 2001 20:46:41 -0400  Lawrence Smith (lsmith@lwsphoto.com) 
wrote:

>  I don't really have enough RAM in my computer, only 384.

Just a thought. Do you get stop/start motion of the film carrier because of 
spooling, during the actual scanning process?

If yes, do you still see banding on a problematic small, selective area 
scan off the same original - with everything else set the same?

You can probably see where I am heading with this - wondering if mechanical 
inertia is affecting integration time or stepping accuracy after a halt for 
spooling.

Another question though: have we established that banding can occur on 
either PC or Mac platform? 

Shame VS doesn't yet support the LS8000 yet AFAIK - but does Silverfast? 
Has anyone tried that and obtained banding?
Regards 

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info 
& comparisons




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.