Very good review. Excellent, in fact. Please pass it on to Michael, Ian.
The only comment I would make is on Michael's, vis a vis Polaroid's
financial troubles. It's somewhat perjoritive (although I'm sure he meant it
only as a cautionary), and a tad irrelevant to performance. Be that as it
may.
In the JPEG screen version, I saw *some* details that the Nikon did better
than the Imacon. That's probably mostly artifact, though. It's still one of
the better reviews I've read, of anything, lately.
Best regards, and thanks for the non-relevant (for me) post. (I can't
justify *either* of them--nor the 'Blad to go with it--but it's always fun
to dream, and see good pictures in the bargain :-))--LRA
>From: Ian Lyons <ilyons@msn.com>
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
>Subject: filmscanners: Link to Nikon 8000 Review
>Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 17:42:05 +0100
>
>
>For those interested, my colleague Michael Reichmann has just published his
>initial impressions of the Nikon 8000ED. He compares it to the Imacon
>Photo.
>
>
>http://luminous-landscape.com/nikon-8000.htm
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Ian Lyons
>http://www.computer-darkroom.com
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp