Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: My replacement 8000 is banding like the first one :-(

To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Subject: RE: filmscanners: My replacement 8000 is banding like the first one :-(
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 09:18:25 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <3B595526.836CFAE3@ampsc.com>
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk


> Actually, Nikon LS2000 and LS30 and I suspect all the newer 35mm
> models, at least, move the scanning "unit" (CCD, lens and lighting
> source and any mirrors), and not the film.
> 
> This does probably allow for more accurate scans in multi-pass
> situations.

Why would that be?

References:
- Re: filmscanners: My replacement 8000 is banding like the first one :-(
  - From: Arthur Entlich <artistic@ampsc.com>

Prev by Date: filmscanners: Scanning Mechanisms
Next by Date: RE: filmscanners: My replacement 8000 is banding like the first one :-(
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: My replacement 8000 is banding like the first one :-(
Next by thread: RE: filmscanners: My replacement 8000 is banding like the first one :-(
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread