ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Re: Vuescan gripes



Ed,

I vote for an option for the two-pane approach--definitely.

Stan

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of EdHamrick@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2001 4:03 PM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: Vuescan gripes

I keep going back and forth on this myself.  Most other scanner
software uses a 2-pane approach with the options and
buttons in one area and an image that's never obscured in
another area.

Regards,
Ed Hamrick




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.