ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Re: Vuescan gripes



> yeah but you guys miss the point
>

I don't think we miss the point, but rather we have different priorities.  I
would love it if VueScan had a better (and more Mac like) interface, but
given the choice between improving the guts of VueScan or the interface, I
will take the guts anytime.  Especially since I can work around the portions
of the interface I don't like.  If the raw scan is bad there is no work
around.  Ed could hire 5 programmers to assist him, spend 6 months getting
them up to speed before getting anything useful out of them, and raise the
price of VueScan from $40 to $400, but I think it would kill VueScan.

I will soon have a brand new computer and am looking into new scanners, both
35 mm film and flatbed.  I would much rather Ed support my next scanners
with an adequate interface than not support my scanners with the worlds best
interface.  I will be very interested to hear when VueScan will support
FireWire scanners running under MacOS X.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.