Re: filmscanners: Archiving Photos (a little off-topic)

["Steve Greenbank" <steve@gccl.fsbusiness.co.uk>]

I'd save the file after any touching up for dust etc. It's a pain to do
once - I'd hate to have to do it again.

If you are using IR dust removal this obviously doesn't apply.

Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Matturri" <jmatturr@earthlink.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 12:30 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Archiving Photos (a little off-topic)


> > I always believe I can do a better job for the
> > finished result in a year, or 5 years later if I ever want to do so.
> >
> Maris
>
> Not saying that this isn't a good idea but it may also be the case that
> scanners will be better in five years, so you may want to rescan at that
> time.
>
> My own method is to save the scan that Vuescan delivers (not exactly a
> raw scan) and then a final corrected scan. It is also not that much
> effort and takes up almost no space to save files associated with
> levels, curves, HSB and other procedures along with selections. With
> this you can reproduce your previous work step by step, making changes
> where needed.
>
> John M.
>
>
>