ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows



If you have Win95 or Win 98 there is a little utility called SYSMON.  It has
a fantastic range of graphs it can show you, including Allocated RAM,
Swapfile in Use, Disk Cache Size, Unused Physical RAM.  Do a File Find for
SYSMON.  If you can't find it, search your Windows disk.  Very handy in
tweaking one's configuration (e.g. setting PS's memory).

If you can't find it I can mail it to you...

Jawed

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon
> Sent: 26 July 2001 19:03
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows
>
>
> I have also been told that; but noone has ever suggested exactly how one
> determines if it is being used or not.  I noticed in both systems
> that since
> the addition of the RAM the Windows resources meter shows proportionately
> less system resources being used than previously (ie., more system's
> resources available), which is one thing which I take as an
> indication that
> the additional RAM above 512 is being taken into account.  Since all my
> heavy RAM use is with image editimg applications and they all use
> either the
> swap file in Windows or theirown scratch files, it is difficult
> to determing
> when they have stoped using actual RAM and switched over to virtual RAM.
> Howver, you may be right; I just do not know how to tell.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Tony Sleep
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 10:39 AM
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 01:18:23 -0500  LAURIE SOLOMON (LAURIE@advancenet.net)
> wrote:
>
> >  One of my systems has 758MB of RAM and
> > the other has 640MB of RAM.  Maybe I am just lucky. :-)
>
> Or maybe the extra RAM beyond 512Mb doesn't add any benefit, which is what
> I have been told to expect.
>
> Regards
>
> Tony Sleep
> http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film
> scanner info
> & comparisons
>
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.