Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows
on 7/28/01 11:09 AM, Rob Geraghty at harper@wordweb.com wrote:
> "Steve Greenbank" <steve@gccl.fsbusiness.co.uk> wrote:
>> Further, in my experience of Win NT 4.0 the claimed reliability of desktop
>> PC's is a fallacy. At work I have used around a dozen PC's and all have
> been
>> much less reliable than my home PCs on Win9x.
>
> Gah. I use NT 4.0 SP6a on my computer at work and it is *far* more stable
> than my home PC which runs Win98SE.
>
> Obscanning - I wonder how many of those using Windows with filmscanners are
> running NT or Win2K?
>
> Rob
>
> PS I have upgraded my computer to a Celeron 850 and 512MB RAM from a Celeron
> 533 with 288MB RAM. Using Vuescan and PSP is definitely significantly
> faster.
>
The question I would have to ask is whether it is the NT at work, ao the
cheap boxes your company buys. There are a lot of unstable boards out
there...
Jim Snyder
|
