RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows

["LAURIE SOLOMON" <LAURIE@advancenet.net>]

Neither did I which is why, evidently wrongly, chose to use the system
resource meter as my indicator.  I do know that I get fewer out of memory
messages when using Photoshop, when scanning, and the like than I did before
adding the memory above 512MB.  The only place where I sometimes run out of
space is when printing if the windows\temp folder gets too clogged up with
orphaned files - which is something that really has nothing to do with the
amount of physical RAM installed.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Tony Sleep
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 5:27 AM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows


On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 16:09:14 -0500  Laurie Solomon (laurie@advancenet.net)
wrote:

> Fine; but what do you suggest as a way to determine if and how the
> additional RAM is being taken into account and used?

Dunno, especially as I think PS does some of its own memory management
instead of the OS. But I simply don't know enough to say anything useful.

Regards

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info
& comparisons