ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: 35mm filmscanner choice



Here are the specs from the Nikon Data Sheets:

Coolscan IV ED:          7 elements in 4 groups with 3 ED glass elements
Coolscan 4000 ED:    7 elements in 4 groups with 3 ED glass elements
Coolscan 8000 ED:  14 elements in 6 groups with 6 ED glass elements

So it is possible that the Coolscan IV ED and the Coolscan 4000 ED, both
35mm scanners share the same lens, but the Coolscan 8000 which is a medium
format scanner does not.  Not too surprising.

---
Jerry M. Pine
San Jose, CA

Photographs are made, not taken.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jawed Ashraf" <Jawed@cupidity.force9.co.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 11:54 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: 35mm filmscanner choice

> A while back on this list there was a discussion about why teh Nikons use
so
> many elements in the lenses.  One thought occurred to me: maybe the 4000
and
> 40 share a lens.  And maybe, gulp, this lens is also used in the 8000.  It
> would certainly keep costs down...
>
> Jawed
>
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.