ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Anyone having problems with Scan@leben?



FWIW, McAfee shuts me down using graphics on a small RAM base. For some 
unknown reason, it makes backups of each scan as I do them, and crashes the 
program (sometimes the system) after one or two scans. That might not be a 
problem if I bought more RAM, but I bought Norton, instead.

Best regards--LRA


>From: Bigboy9955@aol.com
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: Anyone having problems with Scan@leben?
>Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 17:42:41 EDT
>
>In a message dated 8/3/2001 3:20:17 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>Paul_Chefurka@pmc-sierra.com writes:
>
>
> > I use McAfee on my home machine.  It's the same deal, $40 a year and 
>daily
> > updates.  I haven't noticed any impact on my system's performance and 
>it's
> > saved my bacon a number of times.
> >
> >
>
>I think I had the "works" with Norton, 3 or 4 different programs that came 
>in
>a package deal (can't remember the other names offhand).  Maybe I should 
>try
>McAfee or Computer Associates (if they're still in business).
>Ed


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.