ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: film vs. digital cameras - wedding/commercial photography




----- Original Message -----
From: Austin Franklin <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:14 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: film vs. digital cameras - wedding/commercial
photography


>
> > "...The digital camera gives you only 6M*8bit/channel=6Mbytes..."
> > 6Mpixels *8bits/channel *3channels = 144Mbytes. This assumes 3
bytes/pixel
> > it may be higher if bit deepth per channel is greater than 8.
> > Bob Wright
>
> Er, no.  That would be 144M BITS, not bytes, which is 24M Bytes...
>
Mea coupa! But still greater than 6 Mbytes.





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.