ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: film vs. digital cameras - wedding/commercial p hotography



> > > When the digital cameras get to 16M pixels, I will
> > > consider
> > > getting one...but I will probably always use film anyway, since I
> > > shoot
> > > mostly B&W these days, and I don't do weddings any more.
> > > 
> > 
> Kodak already has a 16M pixel back out for Hasselblad cameras - the Kodak
> DCS Pro Back.  See http://www.kodak.com/go/dcsproback .  Only $20k  :-)

You're right, but I was referring to more 35mm sized cameras...




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.