ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!!



Robert writes:

> Since you say it yourself that this is only the
> *theoretical* dynamic range then why do you already
> exclude the Polaroid without making any actual test.

I've consistently heard that it isn't as good as the LS-2000, and some sample
scans I've seen appear to support this.  Specifically, it appears to have a
smaller dynamic range.

I can't do an actual test myself, because that would require buying the scanner.

> You even say yourself that the LS-2000 has lots
> of noise.

Where did I say that?  It has no more than I'd expect of a scanner in its class.






 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.