Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!!
Robert writes:
> Since you say it yourself that this is only the
> *theoretical* dynamic range then why do you already
> exclude the Polaroid without making any actual test.
I've consistently heard that it isn't as good as the LS-2000, and some sample
scans I've seen appear to support this. Specifically, it appears to have a
smaller dynamic range.
I can't do an actual test myself, because that would require buying the scanner.
> You even say yourself that the LS-2000 has lots
> of noise.
Where did I say that? It has no more than I'd expect of a scanner in its class.
|