ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!!



I somehow just knew that your response would not disappoint.

Goodby
Brad

________________________________________

Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> 
> Brad writes:
> 
> > As taught in every law school, you've had a counter
> > argument for any and every point raised, without, as
> > I remember, ever recognizing that there might be
> > some validity to the point being made or, as I
> > can remember, offering a thank you to those spending
> > their time in trying to offer suggestions.
> 
> All of the points raised involved making changes (usually rebuilding the 
>system)
> to accommodate an LS-4000 that is not compatible with SCSI and Windows NT--but
> this is something that I had already ruled out, so those points were moot.
> 
> I originally wanted to know what _other_ scanner supporting SCSI and Windows 
>NT
> might be the equal of the LS-4000.  The Polaroid SS4000 has been suggested, 
>so I
> am considering that, although I still have some questions about the dynamic
> range, and it is essential that this range be equal to or greater than the
> LS-2000, since I scan mostly slides.
> 
> > Clearly you already know that your problem is
> > insolvable!!!!  It is obvious what your only solution is.
> 
> See above.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.