ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Anti-Newton Rings powder



>My understanding of "Newton Rings" is that they came from the same source as
>the rainbow on an oil-slick or a thin prism put on a reflector.  Namely you
>are getting 1/2 wave interference patterns from the light reflected at each
>"boundary layer" - a "boundary layer" is where the optical density, (or
>transmissivity etc ie the "C" of nu = C/lambda aka Freq = C/Wavelength),
>changes.  At all such boundary layers,  light gets reflected in proportion
>to how steep the gradient is (this is why lenses are coated to improve
>contrast - the coatings reduce the gradient).
>
>So the way to reduce Newton rings is to insure more than 1-2 wavelenths of
>separation between these reflective regions.  Putting some translucent dust
>of sufficient diameter, between the surfaces in effect acts as a separator.
>But such dust would also act as a diffuser, reducing contrast and acuity

I know people used to use it for projected slides.  I was told that 
is was composed of microscopic glass beads.  I would be concerned 
about picking them up in a scan.
-- 
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.