ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: New filmscanners reviews



> If people on this list don't know who I work for !! :0)
>

Sorry, I probably should not have responded to the original post - it just
struck me as funny and obvious that the review would be favorable to
Polaroid.  I have seen enough of David Hemingway's post to know that,
although he works for Polaroid, he is not just a shrill for them.  In fact,
there are certain posters that I tend to read even if the thread does not
sound interesting to me - David is one of them.

I was serious when I said thanks for posting the notice of the upcoming
review as I am looking into buying a new high-end 35 mm slide scanner.  I am
trying to decide between the Nikon and the Polaroid 4000 dpi scanners.  I
definitely like the price of the Polaroid but would really like to have the
ICE^3 for my older slides. I expect to wait for the price of the Nikon to
come down or for Polaroid to introduce a new model.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.