ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: Re: Nikon Super coolscan 4000 Problems



Jawed

I am using Ice on Nomal and using Nikon Scan 3.1.  My slides are very clean
and exposures on slides I scan are all excellent.  With Photo CD scans, I
easily cleaned up spots with the Photoshop rubber stamp.  Clearly, there is
a problem with dust in the scanner.  I am getting the impression that the
cost of using Digital Ice is some loss of definition and sharpness which
can't be restored by using unsharp mask in Photoshop.  In fact, I compared
scans with Digital Ice on Normal and turned off, then sharpened in
Photoshop, and the scan without Ice was far superior.

Martin 




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.