Ah well, it seems the combination of crappy lenses in the cameras I've used
plus the LS40 means that the softening due to ICE I suffer is negligible in
the grand scheme of things - try Vuescan Martin - I don't like Vuescan's ICE
as it leaves more obvious damage visible (unless it's recently got better,
since 7.1.5).
I use GEM 2 the whole time, too. Sharpness just aint my bag.
Now I wonder if Mike Duncan's gonna post SFR data for ICE Normal and ICE
Fine on film in the FH3 or slides in the MA20...
Jawed
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Enoch's Vision,
> Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)
> Sent: 31 August 2001 21:35
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Cc: 'filmscanners@halftone.co.uk'
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Super coolscan 4000 Problems
>
>
> At 14:49 31-08-01 -0400, Hemingway, David J wrote:
> >"ICE" is what it is. It gets rid of dust at the cost of image
> sharpness. If
> >that tradeoff is acceptable it will work for him.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jawed Ashraf [mailto:Jawed@cupidity.force9.co.uk]
> > >
> > > I think Martin *needs* ICE . I hope he can get it working
> > > the way he wants.
>
>
> One word: VUESCAN. I don't care for the interface but love its results.
> Martin can tryout Vuescan to see how well it uses the Nikon's infrared
> channel to remove crud while preserving image sharpness.
>
>
> Cary Enoch Reinstein aka Enoch's Vision, Inc., Peach County, Georgia
> , http://www.bahaivision.com/ -- "Behind all
> these manifestations is the one radiance, which shines through
> all things.
> The function of art is to reveal this radiance through the
> created object."
> ~Joseph Campbell
>
>
