ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Re: Nikon Super coolscan 4000 Problems



In a message dated 8/31/2001 2:50:18 PM EST, rlb@triad.rr.com writes:

> That's exactly my findings as well.  I have had my Nikon 8000 for about a
>  month and I was anxious to try it with ICE.  The first negative I scanned
>  without ICE and I scanned the exact negative with ICE.  The only changes
>  that I made was the ICE portion.  In my opinion there was noticeable 
quality
>  difference between the two.  I preferred the scan WITHOUT ICE and have not
>  used it since.

Could you check VueScan's "Filter|Infrared clean" option?  It only
smooths the image in the vicinity of the dust spots, not the whole image.

Regards,
Ed Hamrick




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.