ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: My 8000 does NOT ba nd using Vuescan!



Windsor wrote:
>Since the banding problem has not turned up with the Polaroid 
>implementation I don't think that the three row CCD idea is something 
>that does not work in practice. It may or may not depending on how it 
>is implemented.

Absolutely.  It's an engineering/design fault.  I didn't mean to say it
*couldn't* work.  Just as lots of scanners work happily at 2700ppi without
getting jaggies like the LS30 does. ;)

Rob


Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
http://wordweb.com






 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.