ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: supra 400



Not an answer, but I had exactly the same problem with Supra 400.  Stopped
using it even though it is supposed to be 'scanner optimized'.

Tom

> I have a number of supra 400 images that I will need to get
> decent scans of. Using my SS4000 I get terrible grain
> aliasing making the quality unacceptable. I was thinking
> that I would have to bite the bullet and get drum scans
> made, but it occurs to me that if aliasing is an
> interference pattern based on ccd size a smaller ccd cell
> size might solve the problem. Has anyone had good results
> with this film with a 2750 (or whatever) dpi scanner,
> especially the Nikon?
>
> j
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.