The publisher didn't whine about receiving a photo scanned by yourself? I was
under the impression (although it is perhaps a myth nowadays) that a fair number
of publishers want to do their own scans (and I have been asked for a
transparency on at least one occasion, which I refused).
A 2700-dpi scan is good enough for anything short of a poster-sized publication,
though (and even for that it may well suffice), even if some publishers refuse
to recognize this.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Denise E. Kissinger" <neselain@swbell.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 20:10
Subject: Re: filmscanners: OT (a bit): Publishing pictures :)
> Congratulations!!!
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rob Geraghty" <harper@wordweb.com>
> To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:51 PM
> Subject: filmscanners: OT (a bit): Publishing pictures :)
>
>
> > I just wanted to share my excitement about getting the cover photo and two
> > articles in the September issue of Australian Ultralight magazine. I
> confess
> > my brother produces the magazine for the AUF, but it's still cool to have
> > my photos published in a news-stand magazine. The photos were taken on
> > Kodak Supra 100 and Provia 100F, and scanned with my Nikon LS30.
> Apparently
> > the laser proofs looked better than the printed magazine - mostly because
> > the printing company's better press was being used for a month to do
> another
> > job.
> >
> > It's probably ho hum for the pro photographers on the list, but this is
> > still exciting for me being able to go into a newsagency and see a photo
> > I took on the cover of a magazine. Especially when I took the photo and
> > scanned it! :)
> >
> > Rob
> >
> >
> > Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system ().
> Version: 6.0.276 / Virus Database: 145 - Release Date: 9/3/01
>
