Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan & VS Negative dynamic range
>===== Original Message From "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> =====
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Mike Duncan
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:20 PM
>> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan & VS Negative dynamic range
>>
>>
>> >> Comparing NS3.1 with the Kodak print of the Max400 Stouffer dupe,
>> >> NS3.1 has
>> >> more dynamic range by at least two stops. The print compresses the
>> >> brightest 2 stops and the darkest step is compressed.
>> >>
>> >> Mike Duncan
>> >
>> >What does the scanning software have to do with the dynamic range of the
>> >scanner? Are you letting the software set your setpoints?
>>
>> The software maps the input range into the 8-bit video.
>> Different settings
>> in VS give different OD ranges. Nikon negative setting is mapped
>> to give a
>> higher contrast than VS normal negative setting. Of course you can adjust
>> this with brightness and curve adjustment. NS3.0 has a different mapping
>> for Positives than NS3.1, the latter giving wider OD range.
>>
>> Mike Duncan
>
>Mapping the input data into 8 bit values has nothing to do with the dynamic
>range of the A/D data. That 8 bit data can represent any dynamic range at
>all. In fact, three bits can represent any dynamic range at all. It is the
>resolution within that dynamic range that the 8 bits gives you.
Yep, agreed. Not rocket science.
>
>Curves are different than setpoints. If you are seeing reduced dynamic
>range, the setpoints are not being set correctly, or are being set
>differently. If the software allows you to set the setpoints manually, you
>will be able to get the exact same dynamic range from any software.
Yes Nikon Scan allows you to set the black and white points (levels sliders,
curves and master/R/G/B brightness) but "the mix" of settings you can make *in
combination* with NS's Auto Exposure "on" setting, prevents you getting all
the range from a neg with a large dynamic range. It's really that simple -
I've spent hours tweaking the whole thing.
(When I turn off Auto Exposure the scan comes out irreperably coloured - I've
tried and tried and I can't fix these scans - they are bizarre beyond belief,
and I've built some funny looking curves trying to fix them - anyone got this
working?)
You can adjust brightness when scanning a neg within the range -0.75 to +.5
(ish) before the losses (shadow blocking or highlight scorching) become so bad
that the exercise is pointless. I have Supra 400 and Fuji Superia 200 negs
that NS simply cannot get the full DR out of, no matter how I tweak
brightness, curves etc.
Fundamentally NS gives you a restricted range of "setpoints", which
unfortunately fall within the DR of negs - not by a huge amount, but enough to
upset a purist/perfectionist. NS always seems to clip the white point.
90% of negs (guess, maybe it's 95%, 99%, dunno) don't have such a huge DR that
NS can't get all of it, so it's not actually a disaster.
My old Primefilm 1800 and its accompanying software did, at least, allow me to
adjust the setpoints WAY outside of the DR of negs - unfortunately it was
relatively noisy and grain-aliased like a champion (in comparison with the
LS40, anyway).
Jawed
|