ðòïåëôù
áòèé÷
Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
óôáôøé
ðåòóïîáìøîïå
ðòïçòáííù
ðéûéôåðéóøíá
Harvey writes: > Your ignorance is showing here. Roller transport > development is inherently more likely to scratch > film than dip & dunk. I addressed possibility, not probability. > Shame on you! See above.
Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.