ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging



Austin writes:

> Everyone disagrees, but you've already said you
> don't see any difference, so what's the use?

Well, another option is to actually put some examples online.  I don't generally
believe or disbelieve things just because others believe or disbelieve them; I
like to see objective evidence or proof.  That's why I question why nobody
worries about fogging, but everyone worries about "foreign" film and
development, even though I've seen proof that fogging is a problem, but no proof
that foreign labs or films are a problem.

> Everyone else on this list, professional photographer,
> expert photographer, and otherwise are all wrong and
> you are, obviously, right.

I believe this argument qualifies as a fallacy of distraction based on
popularity (i.e., the assertion that something must be true because most people
believe it to be so).




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.